Reasoning Models
Reasoning-capable models may use additional internal computation before producing the final answer.
Some models are designed to “think through” problems step-by-step. DEVUP AI acts as a transparent proxy for these models, and does not guarantee exposure of a model's private chain-of-thought. Available controls and returned metadata depend entirely on the selected model and upstream provider.
How it works
Using reasoning models
You can interact with reasoning models using standard Chat Completions.
Reasoning output
Reasoning-capable models may return their chain of thought in a separate reasoning_content field on the message object, alongside the standard content field. Depending on the model, this field may be null or absent entirely. Clients must not assume that reasoning_content is present.
Token budget
Reasoning tokens are counted as completion tokens and are billed. Any configured max_tokens budget must cover reasoning and the answer. If the budget is exhausted during reasoning, the response carries finish_reason "length" with an empty content string — and is still billed.
Handling empty content
When processing responses from reasoning models, check the returned finish_reason and handle cases where content === "" rather than assuming a non-empty string is always returned.
Provider-specific extensions
Transparent payload forwarding
DEVUP AI guarantees standard OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions fields. However, the API acts as a transparent proxy and forwards the complete request body upstream without stripping unknown fields.
This means you may pass optional, provider-specific configuration fields (such as reasoning_effort or reasoning objects) in your payload. If the upstream provider supports them, they will be processed. Note that these are not portable across all models, and their behavior is not guaranteed by the DEVUP AI contract.
When to use reasoning models
Reasoning-capable models excel at tasks requiring careful deduction, but they are not universally superior.
Tasks that may not benefit from reasoning
Simple extraction, classification, translation, and short factual queries may not benefit from additional reasoning effort and could introduce unnecessary latency.
Usage and limitations
Latency
Reasoning depth may affect latency, output usage, and cost depending on the selected model. Internal processing before returning the first visible token can take significant time.
Model-dependent Support
Check the model catalog to identify which models are designed with extended reasoning capabilities.
Output Limits & Metadata
Reasoning models may consume output tokens for their internal processing. Any reported usage metadata (e.g. reasoning token counts) or streaming reasoning traces depend entirely on the upstream provider's response format and are not strictly guaranteed.